Your AI gives everyone the same idea.
Ask your AI for a metaphor about time. Odds are, it says river.
Not just your AI: 25 models were asked this. Most said river or weaver.Artificial Hivemind, NeurIPS 2025
“Time” through method34:

One pearl held 2,615 layers. It grew four or five a day for a year and a half. The oldest day is still buried in the deepest layers, smoothed over by every day since.

The present is a blob of molten glass, soft enough to be shaped while it still glows. With every second it cools, a few more forms become impossible. And once cold, it is the past: its shape will never change again.

Every day you let most of the sourdough go and give the last spoonful fresh flour. It rises again. Tonight’s bread comes from something alive since last spring, though barely a crumb of last spring’s flour is left.

When you lift your foot off the pedal and let a minute slow you down, the car quietly charges itself. Those slow minutes help you climb the next hill.
This page came almost entirely out of method34. Except the method itself.
A match needs something rough to strike. AI needs this too.
Here are 34. Tap one.Hover over one.
Three people who never meet answer the same brief.
Think it through in three languages; keep what only one found.
One property of an unrelated word shapes the answer, unnamed.
Ban the default move and name what replaces it.
The model invents one odd person and answers only as them.
Dice choose the cell; the model has to fill it.
Force the answer into a rigid form and let the content bend.
A craftsperson and an expert from different worlds meet on one idea.
Ask the brief five ways; keep the answer that differs most.
Six thinking hats, one contribution each, one solution.
Ask what the task really is, name it in three words, solve there.
Write the first three ideas, then forbid them.
Start from four mechanisms and deepen only the survivors.
Map the field as a tree and join two leaves far apart.
A wild coach until the bell, then a strict one.
Design five worst ideas, then invert what makes them worst.
Ban every mechanism already used and look outside the list.
List what professionals take for granted; break one by lot.
Generate ten, group by mechanism, keep one from the smallest group.
Fuse the core idea with a drawn domain into one that needs both.
Five answers with their odds; keep the least likely one that works.
Name the contradiction and solve it with inventive principles.
Mark the obvious cell in the grid and go farthest from it.
Solve the task as if it belonged to a world far away.
Borrow one mechanism from a distant field with the same shape.
Restate the problem three ways; solve the one that changes what winning means.
Obey one strange instruction and leave no trace of it.
Solve three similar problems first, then let them correct the answer.
Generate with the rules hidden; bring them back only to choose.
Keep the strongest part of each and build one idea on them.
Breed six ideas, never two on the same mechanism.
Every rejection becomes a rule for the next round.
Branch, score, prune the siblings that look alike.
Keep the best idea per cell and aim at the empty ones.
27 come from AI research, 5 are classic tools, and 2 are the author’s own.
“Be more creative” is just an adjective. You need a procedure.
method34 is a skill for your AI agent: Claude Code, Codex and others. You give it a task, and it solves it with 3 different methods from the deck below.
Give it a task. It sorts the methods into 3 groups by fit and draws 1 at random from each.
In your agent, type:
- /method34 <task>
- 3 ideas, side by side.
Short on time? /method34 light <task> gives 1 idea, the best fit.
You get 3 ideas. One method fits, one fits partly, and one is a deliberate mismatch.
Draw again, or fuse the best parts into 1 idea.
- /method34 again
- 3 new methods, none repeated.
- /method34 fuse
- The best parts, in 1 idea.
Run the same prompt on your own machine.
Install the method34 skill from https://github.com/gr34tlab/method34. 1. Download the repository into a temporary folder. 2. Copy the skill folder to ~/.claude/skills/method34/. Do not copy the .git folder. 3. Show me the Quick start section of SKILL.md.
Optional: check it first
Want to look inside before you install? Run this one first. It installs nothing.
Check the method34 skill from https://github.com/gr34tlab/method34. Do not install anything. 1. Download the repository into a temporary folder. 2. Read every file, including the Python scripts in scripts/. 3. For each script, tell me these four things: - What the script does. - If the script reads or writes anything outside the skill folder. - If the script makes network calls. - If the script asks for keys. 4. Show me the list of files and your findings.
Claude Code · Codex · other agents that work with local files. The check installs nothing.
Free. Run by hand, never automated, never built into a product or a company’s systems. Read the license.
Dmitrii Keshishev, founder of Great Lab, built method34. And this page with it.
Built for ideas: names, campaigns, headlines, visual concepts.
Bring me your brand or product. I put the team together and lead the work. First versions from five working days.
Work with meI build methods that move AI off its default answer. method34 is the first one made public.
Research with meBuilt with Claude Code / method34 / Exa, web search for agents / Ideogram, ChatGPT and Gemini for images / Photoshop / ffmpeg / A human
All sources
AI research · 25 papers
- No. 01 Persona setBreaking Homogeneity: Diversifying Persona Sets for Creative LLM OutputsMoon et al., 2026. arXiv 2609.30492
- No. 02 Meta-persona anchoringBeyond the Hivemind: Escaping LLM Homogeneity via Meta-Persona Anchoring and Sequential Temperature ScalingFu et al., 2026. arXiv 2608.02618
- No. 03 Paired constraints, No. 13 Scale then dedupeAI and Its Impact on Creativity and Diversity: An Empirical Study of LLM-Generated Product IdeasTerwiesch et al., 2026. arXiv 2607.27553
- No. 05 Distant-domain analogyOn the Diversity of Analogy Making in Large Language ModelsShen et al., 2026. arXiv 2608.03233
- No. 06 Language of thoughtLanguage of Thought Shapes Output Diversity in Large Language ModelsXu and Zhang, 2026. arXiv 2601.11227
- No. 08 Retrieval-grounded inspirationNova: An Iterative Planning and Search Approach to Enhance Novelty and Diversity of LLM Generated IdeasHu et al., 2024. arXiv 2410.14255
- No. 10 Forbid the first NIDEAFix: Evaluation Framework for Creative Defixation Prompting in LLMsCarichon et al., 2026. arXiv 2606.00875
- No. 11 Verbalized samplingVerbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM DiversityZhang et al., 2025. arXiv 2510.01171
- No. 12 Dice-conditioned generationGacha Decoding: Eliciting Diverse Generations Through Instruction FollowingGeng et al., 2026. arXiv 2610.01382
- No. 14 Diverge then convergeBeyond One Path: Evaluating and Enhancing Divergent Thinking in Interactive LLM AgentsPark et al., 2026. arXiv 2605.28465
- No. 15 Random stimulusAddressing LLM Diversity by Infusing Random ConceptsAgrawal and Goyal, 2026. arXiv 2601.18053
- No. 16 Analogy-driven reformulationFluid Transformers and Creative Analogies: Exploring Large Language Models' Capacity for Augmenting Cross-Domain Analogical CreativityDing et al., 2023. arXiv 2302.12832
- No. 17 Thought propagationThought Propagation: An Analogical Approach to Complex Reasoning with Large Language ModelsYu et al., 2023. arXiv 2310.03965
- No. 18 Conceptual blendingVisual Conceptual Blending with Large-scale Language and Vision ModelsGe and Parikh, 2021. arXiv 2106.14127
- No. 19 TRIZ contradictionAutoTRIZ: Automating Engineering Innovation with TRIZ and Large Language ModelsJiang et al., 2024. arXiv 2403.13002
- No. 20 Parallel hatsPTFA: An LLM-based Agent that Facilitates Online Consensus Building through Parallel ThinkingGu et al., 2025. arXiv 2503.12499
- No. 21 Diverge/converge coachScaffolding Creativity: How Divergent and Convergent LLM Personas Shape Human Machine Creative Problem-SolvingRosenbaum et al., 2025. arXiv 2510.26490
- No. 22 Topic-tree distant pairingThe Budget AI Researcher and the Power of RAG ChainsLee and Ma, 2025. arXiv 2506.12317
- No. 23 Form constraintLanguage Models are Lazy Poets: Creative Mode Collapse at ScaleMatthews and Hamilton, 2026. arXiv 2610.24223
- No. 24 Template rotationDiversity Combining for Multi-Path LLM ReasoningYu et al., 2026. arXiv 2609.38829
- No. 29 Wide parallel initialisationInitialization Improves LLM-Driven DiscoverySakarvadia et al., 2026. arXiv 2610.00707
- No. 30 Critique as constraints, No. 34 Candidate fusionTest-Time Scaling in the Wild: Why Exploitation, Not Exploration, Is the BottleneckRomano et al., 2026. arXiv 2608.18931
- No. 31 Evolutionary populationEvoGens: A Population-Based Heuristic Search Framework for Scientific Idea GenerationLi et al., 2026. arXiv 2605.30961
- No. 32 Quality-diversity archiveParameter-Efficient Neuroevolution for Diverse LLM Generation: Quality-Diversity Optimization via Prompt Embedding EvolutionGuo et al., 2026. arXiv 2605.09781
- No. 33 Tree of ideasMagellan: Guided MCTS for Latent Space Exploration and Novelty GenerationChang, 2025. arXiv 2510.21341
Classic tools · 5
- No. 04 Reframe and name the frameWinston, MIT 6.034
- No. 09 Seen-set exclusionWinston, non-redundant generator
- No. 26 Worst possible ideaClassic tool
- No. 27 Morphological boxClassic tool
- No. 28 Oblique instructionClassic tool
The author’s own · 2
- No. 07 Maker + knower pairThe author’s own method
- No. 25 Assumption ledgerThe author’s own method